Overcoming browser throttling of setInterval executions

To preserve device battery and reduce unwanted CPU consumptions, browsers throttle the execution of callbacks passed to the setInterval method, whenever the webpage becomes hidden. This happens whenever the browser window is minimized, the browser tab is changed and in a few other special cases.

Read more on this Medium article.

View this Demo page

LINQ Distinct. How To Get Distinct Values From A Collection Using LINQ.

LINQ pronounced as “Link” is a .NET component that enables the processing of the native queries directly into C# and VB.NET languages. LINQ has Distinct() function which provides the unique list of values from a single data source. 

Example Class – LINQ Distinct by Property or Field Using Distinct function

The Distinct() method is used to remove the duplicate values from the list and gives the unique values. Let us consider the example in which you need to have unique values from Book List, and you have the following model:

public class Book
{
        public int BookID { get; set; }
        public string Title { get; set; }
        public string Author { get; set; }
}

List of dummy data of the books. In real word scenario, the list is could be from live database or any other data source.


public List GetBooks() 
{
            List books = new List();

            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 1, Title = "Book Title 1", Author = "Author 1" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 2, Title = " Book Title 2", Author = "Author 2" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 3, Title = " Book Title 3", Author = "Author 1" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 4, Title = " Book Title 4", Author = "Author 2" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 5, Title = " Book Title 5", Author = "Author 8" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 6, Title = " Book Title 4", Author = "Author 2" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 7, Title = " Book Title 6", Author = "Author 4" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 8, Title = " Book Title 8", Author = "Author 2" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 9, Title = " Book Title 3", Author = "Author 3" });
            books.Add(new Book { BookID = 10, Title = " Book Title 5", Author = "Author 1" });

            return books;
}

LINQ Distinct() using Property

The Distinct() function in LINQ can be applied by the properties. You can make groups and get the first object from each group or you can use DistinctBy function to achieve the required result.

LINQ DistinctBy() On a Property

DistinctBy() apply on a specified property to get unique values from a list of objects. If you need a distinct list based on one or more properties, you can use the following code:

List bookList = GetBooks().DistinctBy(book => new { book.BookID, book.Title });

Using GroupBy and Select on a Property

By taking the above sample data, you can get the distinct author list by using the following code, as it will group the similar author named books first, and then select the first of every group in list.

List bookList = GetBooks().GroupBy(book => book.Author).Select(x => x.First()) .ToList();

LINQ Distinct By – Field

The Distinct() function in LINQ can be applied on the fields of tables also. This will group the similar data of the given field and return the unique list by selecting the first or default of the group depending on the requirement.

yourTable.GroupBy(x => x.TableFieldColumn).Select(x => x.FirstOrDefault());

When you use reference type object, LINQ will treat the values as unique even the property values are same. To overcome this situation, you can use either of the following ways to have distinct values:

LINQ Group By and Select Operators

In this method, GroupBy function is used to group the list which can either be a static list or a dynamic list. The Select operator is used to fetch the results from a list or a grouped list.

In this example, grouping is done by using the groupby operator to group Authors and Title and then Select is used to get the first result of a grouped list.

using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Linq; 
namespace MyFirstApp{
     public class LINQProgram {
              public static void Main(String[] args) {
                      List bookList = GetBooks()
                                       .GroupBy(book => new { book.Author, book.Title })
                                       .Select(book => book.FirstOrDefault());
             }
     } 
}

Distinct with IEqualityComparer

You can give an instance of IEqualityComparer to an overloaded method of the Distinct method. For that, you need to create a new class “BookComparer” that must be implementing the IEqualityComparer to overload it.

using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Linq; 

namespace MyFirstApp{

     public class BookComparer : IEqualityComparer   // Implements interface
     {
            public bool Equals(Book x, Book y) {
                if (Object.ReferenceEquals(x, y)) 
                    return true;

                if (Object.ReferenceEquals(x, null) || Object.ReferenceEquals(y, null))
                    return false;

                return x.Author == y.Author && x.Title == y.Title;
            }

            public int GetHashCode(Book book) {
                if (Object.ReferenceEquals(book, null)) 
                       return 0;

                int hashBookName = book.Author == null ? 0 : book.Author.GetHashCode();
                int hashBookCode = book.Title == null ? 0 : book.Title.GetHashCode();
                return hashBookName ^ hashBookCode;

            }
     } 

     public class LINQProgram {

              public static void Main(String[] args) {

                      List bookList = GetBooks()
                                      .Distinct(new BookComparer());
             }
     }
}

Using Select and Distinct operators

You can use the Select and Distinct functions to get rid of the repeated values from a list of objects. In the following example, select and distinct operators are used to get the unique values from Books list.

using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Linq; 

namespace MyFirstApp{
     public class LINQProgram {
              public static void Main(String[] args) {
                      List bookList = GetBooks()
                                        .Select(book => new { book.Author, book.Title })
                                       .Distinct();
             }
     } 
}

LINQ Distinct by Field

If you want to achieve the distinct values for a specific field in the list, you can use the following two methods:

1. Using GroupBy and Select functions

In this approach, you need to use two LINQ functions i.e., GroupBy and Select to get the list of unique field values. You can use the following code to have groupby and select in one query.


using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Linq; 

namespace MyFirstApp{

     public class LINQProgram {

              public static void Main(String[] args) {

                      List bookList = GetBooks()
                                                             .GroupBy(o => o.Author)
                                                             .Select(o => o.FirstOrDefault());
             }
     } 
}

2. Using Select and Distinct functions

In the second approach, you need to use two LINQ functions i.e. Select and Distinct, to achieve the list of unique field values.

using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Linq; 

namespace MyFirstApp{

     public class LINQProgram {

              public static void Main(String[] args) {

                      List bookList = GetBooks()
                                                             .Select(o => new { Author = o.Author } )
                                                             .Distinct();
             }
     } 
}

Sources

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19548043/select-all-distinct-values-in-a-column-using-linq

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.distinct?view=net-7.0

Is it possible to add index on temp tables ?

The @tableName syntax is a table variable. They are rather limited. The syntax is described in the documentation for DECLARE @local_variable. You can kind of have indexes on table variables, but only indirectly by specifying PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints on columns. So, if your data in the columns that you need an index on happens to be unique, you can do this. See this answer. This may be “enough” for many use cases, but only for small numbers of rows. If you don’t have indexes on your table variable, the optimizer will generally treat table variables as if they contain one row (regardless of how many rows there actually are) which can result in terrible query plans if you have hundreds or thousands of rows in them instead.

The #tableName syntax is a locally-scoped temporary table. You can create these either using SELECT…INTO #tableName or CREATE TABLE #tableName syntax. The scope of these tables is a little bit more complex than that of variables. If you have CREATE TABLE #tableName in a stored procedure, all references to #tableName in that stored procedure will refer to that table. If you simply reference #tableName in the stored procedure (without creating it), it will look into the caller’s scope. So you can create #tableName in one procedure, call another procedure, and in that other procedure read/update #tableName. However, once the procedure that created #tableName runs to completion, that table will be automatically unreferenced and cleaned up by SQL Server. So, there is no reason to manually clean up these tables unless if you have a procedure which is meant to loop/run indefinitely or for long periods of time.

You can define complex indexes on temporary tables, just as if they are permanent tables, for the most part. So if you need to index columns but have duplicate values which prevents you from using UNIQUE, this is the way to go. You do not even have to worry about name collisions on indexes. If you run something like CREATE INDEX my_index ON #tableName(MyColumn) in multiple sessions which have each created their own table called #tableName, SQL Server will do some magic so that the reuse of the global-looking identifier my_index does not explode.

Additionally, temporary tables will automatically build statistics, etc., like normal tables. The query optimizer will recognize that temporary tables can have more than just 1 row in them, which can in itself result in great performance gains over table variables. Of course, this also is a tiny amount of overhead. Though this overhead is likely worth it and not noticeable if your query’s runtime is longer than one second.

for example, you can create the PRIMARY KEY on a temp table.

IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#tempTable') IS NOT NULL
 DROP TABLE #tempTable

CREATE TABLE #tempTable 
(
   Id INT PRIMARY KEY
  ,Value NVARCHAR(128)
)

INSERT INTO #tempTable
VALUES 
     (1, 'first value')
    ,(3, 'second value')
    -- will cause Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK__#tempTab__3214EC071AE8C88D'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.#tempTable'. The duplicate key value is (1).
    --,(1, 'first value one more time')


SELECT  * FROM #tempTable

Reference

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6385243/is-it-possible-to-add-index-to-a-temp-table-and-whats-the-difference-between-c

Javascript debugging doesn’t work in razor pages

Chrome (and Canary) used to be able to show javascript source which was embedded in aspx files.

Typically, I would add a debugger; statement, save, and then load my web page in Chrome with the developer tools window open. When Chrome hit the debugger; statement, it would stop and then show the javascript source, so that I could inspect variable or step through code.

A recent change has changed this so that now, when the debugger; statement is executed, Chrome dutifully stops execution but it is unable to show the source.

I had the same problem. When I clicked on the aspx page, under the Sources tab, I got a blank page. What worked for me was refreshing the page in Chrome. After that, the aspx code showed up in Developer Tools, and I was able to see , debug and search the code. This seems to be a Chrome bug.

Chrome Developer tool: html script is blank (in source) debugging tutorial